AlisonW.uk

This site is currently being redeveloped. Although it will work fine it will continue to look terrible for a while yet. Sorry!

2011-06-15 - 11:09:00 - by AlisonW - Topic: Tech: UX |

When searching online you have to guess how a website which might have what you are seeking has chosen to describe its wares. For example, when you go shopping do you:

1. Buy an item,

2. Purchase it,

3. Accept the valuation which they have placed on the item, or

4. Acquire it for a financial consideration?

OK, maybe the last one there is rather more formal than most websites are likely to use, but you get the point. English, because it is such a bastardised language, taking words via French and via German roots (and routes,) has a plethora of options for describing a single activity.

There is then the added issue that a 'sales' website might choose to not use the word for you to gain the object, but merely for them to make it available for sale. "We sell widgets" might as likely not include the words "purchase them here" or "buy them now", assuming the reader already looking at the website can recognise the options for your acquisition. The word 'Pay' could well be the nearest they come to suggesting a financial transaction is on offer.

Anyway, back to the searching …



Recent posts:


A Future in Europe
Mrs May
The cult of personality
Clinton v Trump looking more likely
Dangerous stuff!
Who do you trust with your life?

Latest tweets

Today at 00:39 »
🤚
@hatttiegladwell : Raise your hand if you have a mental illness and you’ve ever:- spent the entire day in bed because you were so de… .https://t.co/qJOSkkkt8B
Yesterday at 22:24 »
@krishgm @RemainerNow @maitlis @KayBurley @SkyNews @BBCNews @Channel4News @LibDems Yes, plus the demographics are better for C4.
  • 1
Yesterday at 21:51 »
Crazy game today, long (4¾hrs!) and error-prone, but #RedSox come through in extras (was only 3-3!) to win 8-6 and…
Yesterday at 21:27 »
While it was happening I though Chavis might have missed touching third bag. Glad to be confirmed wrong. #RedSox 6-3 in tenth.
Yesterday at 21:17 »
RT @JimKilbane :
@JimKilbane : Seen in Oklahoma. .https://t.co/HcxyZkZanS
  • 18
Yesterday at 21:13 »
@davidgerard @Cointelegraph There's a Popecoin? I recall Dogecoin though so I suppose it's similar.
Yesterday at 21:12 »
RAFFY!!! ⚾❤️❤️❤️ #RedSox