AlisonW.uk

This site is currently being redeveloped. Although it will work fine it will continue to look terrible for a while yet. Sorry!

2011-01-09 - 08:26:00 - by AlisonW - Topic: Personal: Memories | Politics | Vehicles |

Over the New Year break I received a letter from the DVLA requiring me to update the photograph on my driving licence (and, of course, to pay a substantial fee for the privilege of doing so!). Although the licence last can be valid for as many as fifty years the picture must be replaced every ten, and that time has come around again for me.

And it got me to thinking about the other images of me which are around and about and which people use to recognise 'me', especially those we all now use online. When we each scan through our Twitter, Facebook, Meetup, and LinkedIn feeds we identify the messages via the icons alongside them far faster than we may look for the associated name or handle. When people change their icons – as happened some years ago when lots of baby pictures appeared and another time when plain green boxes did so – then we have to read slower or even do a double-take when we mis-recognise an icon or it becomes too similar to that of another person on our reading list.

So I'm realising that my most frequent icon – which was once my 'official photograph' in political circles – is showing its age (or rather not showing mine!) and could do with being brought more up to date. But then the 'recognition factor' debate kicks in and I ponder whether it is the right thing to do.

When a product or company changes its name, like Marathon to Snickers or Norwich Union to Aviva it can add "formerly known as" during a change-over period. When they change their logo they can put both on the packaging for a short while to help carry the positive feeling towards the old image to the new one. But something only 80 or 100 pixels wide doesn't have that possibility in practical terms; it is an all-or-nothing change and woebetide the image consultant who advises a client but then gets it wrong.

But, of course, with the online and social media whirl we are each usually our own image consultant and can only blame ourself when we screw things up. So, be prepared for a change of my image coming along. What it will be I don't yet know, though I've plenty of ideas which don't include having my face in there it cannot be denied that faces have a very strong appeal and fast recognition strength. And whatever it changes to will have to stand the test of time for a good few years.



Recent posts:


A Future in Europe
Mrs May
The cult of personality
Clinton v Trump looking more likely
Dangerous stuff!
Who do you trust with your life?

Latest tweets

Today at 16:44 »
@TampaTarpons @MiLB I read that as "Tampa Tampons" at first... Whups.
Today at 16:41 »
It's the British way ...
@tommorris : British Govt: “We must take back control! Sovereignty!”ECJ: “Yup, you can revoke Article 50 at any time if you so… .https://t.co/PROHIdP7Ki
Today at 13:33 »
DxEU Minister has been answering on the Urgent Question for nearly an hour, yet having confirmed that there *is* st…
Today at 11:17 »
AKA BREXIT.
@dirkderidder : Executing a zero risk change request in a production environment
Yesterday at 23:30 »
My sewing machine will do smocking. It does it by making lots of little pricks and tying them together.Ooh.. Ther…
@realDonaldTrump : “Democrats can’t find a Smocking Gun tying the Trump campaign to Russia after James Comey’s testimony. No Smocking… .https://t.co/FDEsflAVZ5
  • 1
Yesterday at 23:22 »
@stephenkb Tom Brake asked that very question. It was indicated that formal opposition party had to support, and preferably move.
Yesterday at 23:21 »
@georgeeaton Won't do any good waiting until March 28th though! Wasted opportunity this evening.