AlisonW.uk

This site is currently being redeveloped. Although it will work fine it will continue to look terrible for a while yet. Sorry!

2011-03-17 - 16:24:00 - by AlisonW - Topic: Tech: Security | Social | Twitter |

I have – 90 hours after submitting the ticket! – had a response from twitter support regarding the suspension of my main account there (@AlisonW). It seems that it was, in fact, the content of the tweet I partially redacted in my earlier post. The accusation was that "Your account has been suspended for posting an individuals private information such as private email address, physical address, telephone number or financial documents. ", which I found I disagreed with, so have written a reply:

Thanks for getting back to me.

I acknowledge that I did post *contact* information for someone in tweet #462080089586401 - this was (a) not confidential in any way, being a matter of public record (in the succeeding tweet #462087285460173 I detailed the online source of that information, stating "See http://www.ipo.gov.uk/domestic?domesticnum=2536161 for basis") and (b) it is not 'private' information, being a publicly-accessible business address for service of documents and not a home address. This was all part of a discussion between the original (and, as I understand it, future) user of the handle "girlgeeks" - at that time having been moved to the handle "girlgeeks_" - and this information was directed to her (for which she subsequently thanked me) though I was unable to make it a single-user reply running out of characters. She has, I have been advised, subsequently had her original handle returned.

I certainly understand the principle of maintaining all *private* information about a user of your service in a secure and confidential manner and have never and would never publish such information, either on twitter or elsewhere. If I was wrong in presuming that public information freely accessible to all (ie. without registration, fee, etc) may not be republished on twitter then my apologies for any misunderstanding.


Given that one of the great successes of Twitter has been the rapid promulgation of existing information from a wide range of websites – usually zipping around the globe via retweets – then I'm somewhat at a loss to understand their point of view of objecting to my copying some information from a public UK Government website, but hopefully my account will return shortly.



Recent posts:


A Future in Europe
Mrs May
The cult of personality
Clinton v Trump looking more likely
Dangerous stuff!
Who do you trust with your life?

Latest tweets

Today at 17:38 »
There's always going to be a problem for a pitcher who used to be on the opposing team, especially one who switches…
Today at 15:02 »
A 'name' is WHATEVER SOMEONE WANTS IT TO BE!It is not up to ANYONE else to determine what does or does not constit…
@MajorMcDoom : App devs, could you please not do this? I'm so sick and tired of this.I understand doing this for usernames, but t… .https://t.co/kK7uB2yVAu
Today at 14:56 »
@rsmck @edent Ooh, bad. Lighting circuits usually fused (MCBd) at 6A, whereas sockets at 15A (spur) or 32A (ring). Should never be mixed.
Today at 14:54 »
@edent @rsmck Ah, yes, I'm sorry to admit I've installed similar connections myself when it has proven easier than…
Today at 11:30 »
Alexander Boris de Pfeffel Johnson's plan has only ever been to get himself a new bed in Downing Street.He has no…
@guardian : Boris Johnson’s braggadocio will soon come back to haunt him at Number 10 | Andrew Rawnsley .https://t.co/zBbWLeCuas
Today at 11:28 »
The sooner lorry companies (and, yes, drivers) are fined the *full* costs associated with bridge strikes the more l…
@don_dapper : As bridges overestimate how visible they are to traffic around them - a hi-vis sign is a really simple step that br… .https://t.co/2nGj8JJmbH
Today at 11:17 »
RT @labisiffre :
@labisiffre : THOUGHTS FOR THE DAY1) Existence Is Eternal & Infinite.2) There Is No Evidence Of God.3) We don’t Find meaning.… .https://t.co/Y1YwYprYeo
  • 6