AlisonW.uk

This site is currently being redeveloped. Although it will work fine it will continue to look terrible for a while yet. Sorry!

2012-02-04 - 22:16:00 - by AlisonW - Topic: Meta: Thoughts |

Yesterday I attended #BenefitsCamp , which was considering various ideas and creating option around the issues related to the UK benefits system.

I'll write elsewhere on my main topic of interest, as it has rather 'grown wings' and deserves a discussion site of its own to be better reviewed and taken forward, but one of the points I made during the event was about the name given to the field. Often seen on job advertisements – or a part of an interview process – is that matter of salary. And alongside 'salary' comes 'benefits', which might be a subsidised canteen, service discounts, pension contributions, or regular bonus payments. And the bankers have made 'bonus' a very bad word indeed.

"Benefits" are perceived as just another name for 'extras'.

So what happens when that same word is applied to payments made to those unemployed, or disabled, or injured and temporarily unable to work? Parts of the media name these payments – which provide a roof over someone's head and allow them to eat, are pretty minimal in the first place – 'benefit' in a way which makes them sound both undeserved by the recipient, and some sort of penalty to the tax-payers who provide the funding to the government.

So the next question, clearly, is what such life-sustaining payments should be called instead.



Recent posts:


A Future in Europe
Mrs May
The cult of personality
Clinton v Trump looking more likely
Dangerous stuff!
Who do you trust with your life?

Latest tweets

Today at 13:03 »
@A50Challenge Let me rewrite this for you..."Article 50 must be cancelled.May has simply made too much of a flip…
Today at 02:21 »
The hypocrisy of @LindseyGrahamSC knows very few bounds.In 2016 he told the truth about candidate Trump. Now, he's…
@Pluvlaw : @LindseyGrahamSC @60Minutes It took some digging, but I think I found your answers...
Yesterday at 23:10 »
Neil Kinnock ejected the members of the Labour Party who were members of the 'party within the party', yet Theresa…
Yesterday at 23:04 »
@OwenJones84 Gaz says he's "not homophobic". Evidence of his own tweet shows YES HE DAMN WELL IS! 😡
Yesterday at 20:34 »
Sometimes I reckon President Orange does this on purpose.
Yesterday at 20:33 »
@shinydh Sadly we'll now never know, though I believe it would have been shown there was collusion. The threats aga…
Yesterday at 20:03 »
Because of the NDA though will there be a precedent set that kneeling is every bit as valid a response as standing?…
@guardian : Colin Kaepernick reaches settlement with NFL over kneeling protest fallout .https://t.co/nP1gW4FHMe